USPTO serial 78207486
THE TASTE OF GOOD TASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE TASTE OF GOOD TASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesus Sanchelima, Esq.
JESUS SANCHELIMA ESQ SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES, PA235 SW LE JEUNE RDMIAMI FL, 33134 1762U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Ready to eat, canned yucca in natural chunks and in frying-portion sizes; ready to eat vegetables, namely, malanga and yams; processed, canned or bottled hearts of palm; processed, canned or bottled tropical fruits in light syrup, namely, papaya, mango, guava shells, grated coconut, and pineapple chunks; marmalades, namely, guava, orange, mango, papaya, pineapple, papaya and mango blend, passion fruit and orange blend, and guava and strawberry blend; processed, canned or bottled natural fruits, namely, papaya, mango, guava, pineapple, and passion fruit pastry fillings without artificial flavorings; guava fruit pulp; olive oil and processed olives | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |