USPTO serial 78207509
LIFE IN BALANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFE IN BALANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bonita Springs, FL
Bonita Springs, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marta I. Burgin
MARTA I BURGIN ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLPONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102-2740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | GOLF COURSES, GOLF CLUB SERVICES, ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF GOLF TOURNAMENTS, TENNIS COURT FACILITIES, ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF TENNIS TOURNAMENTS, RECREATIONAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF SWIMMING POOL SERVICES, COUNTRY CLUB SERVICES, HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUB SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL FITNESS, BEACH CLUB SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |