USPTO serial 78207795
FLASHPARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLASHPARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Moriches, NY
Selden, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship in the field of consumer electronics, Electronic retailing services via computer featuring electronic components for personal computers and digital cameras and cell phones and Digital Video Recorders and Camcorders and other consumer electronic products, Promoting and conducting trade shows in the field of consumer electronics, Promoting sports competitions and/or events of others, Promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with the sport of basketball, Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer network, Promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of discount cards, Promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the websites of others, Promoting the goods and services of others through infomercials played on customer point of purchase television monitors in retail stores, Promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others, Promoting the goods and services of others by means of a preferred customer program featuring points towards purchase of electronics components for personal computers and digital cameras and cell phones and Digital Video Recorders and Camcorders and other consumer electronic products, Promoting the goods and services of others through on-line ordering and cataloging of those goods and services, Promoting the sale of credit card accounts through the administration of incentive award programs; Promoting the sale of goods and services of others by awarding purchase points for credit card use; Promoting the sale of goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contests, Business information in the field of consumer electronics, Business information management in the field of consumer electronics, Conducting on-line trade show exhibition in the field of consumer electronics, Computerized on-line ordering services in the field of consumer electronics, Computerized on-line retail services in the field of consumer electronic | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |