Drawing for ACTIVA SPORTS

USPTO serial 78208167

ACTIVA SPORTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVA SPORTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney F. Brown

3365 BALTIMORE STREETSAN DIEGO, CA 92117UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed catalogs featuring women's active apparel, fitness wear and footwearACTIVE—
035On-line retail store services, mail-order and telephone-order catalog services, all featuring women's active apparel, fitness wear and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
May 1, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance