USPTO serial 78208415
OPTISCALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTISCALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. McKie
JOHN E MCKIE LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO IL, 60604U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely phosphonates, low molecular weight polymers, aminocarboxylates and biocides for use as deflocculants, dispersants, scale inhibitors, corrosion inhibitors and sequestrants in the field of water treatment in the nature of cooling, boiler, process, swimming pool water treatment and desalination, geothermal water treatment, secondary oil recovery and oil field water treatment, in washing and cleaning compositions, photography compositions, paper recycling and pulp and paper bleaching, textile and paper processing, construction, cement modifications; agriculture, horticulture, manufacture of paints and slurries, manufacture of cosmetics and toiletries, metal surface treatment compositions and electroplating, metal finishing, vehicle washing and mineral processing. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |