Drawing for DENTAL GENIUS

USPTO serial 78208439

DENTAL GENIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENTAL GENIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035-ADVERTISING AGENCY, NAMELY PROMOTING THE SERVICES OF DENTISTS - ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING CORPORATE AND BRAND IDENTITY FOR OTHERS - ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING BUSINESS CONFERENCES - BUSINESS CONSULTATION - BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING START-UP SUPPORT FOR BUSINESSES OF OTHERS - BUSINESS EVALUATION OF DENTAL PRACTICES - BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION - BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PLANNING - BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SUPERVISION - BUSINESS MARKETING AND DIRECT MAIL CONSULTING SERVICES - BUSINESS MEETING PLANNING - BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES - BUSINESS MERGER CONSULTATION - BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONAL CONSULTATION - BUSINESS RELOCATION CONSULTING - BUSINESS PLANNING - COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION - DEVELOPING PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGNS FOR BUSINESSES - DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING - DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET - DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER - EFFICIENCY EXPERTS - MAILING LIST PREPARATIONACTIVEJan 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 11, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance