USPTO serial 78208472
NIAGARA FALLS CANADA THE MOST FAMOUS ADDRESS IN THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIAGARA FALLS CANADA THE MOST FAMOUS ADDRESS IN THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services via electronic media, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via radio, television, cable and Internet media, printed media, and direct mailing; and Promotional services, namely, promoting the sale of goods and services through the distribution of electronic and printed material, to others that provide goods and services to tourists | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bretti, Brian E.
- Other trademarks owned by Bretti, Brian E.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named NIAGARA FALLS CANADA THE MOST FAMOUS ADDRESS IN THE WORLD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |