USPTO serial 78208487
NIAGARA FALLS NEW YORK THE MOST FAMOUS ADDRESS IN THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIAGARA FALLS NEW YORK THE MOST FAMOUS ADDRESS IN THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN E. BRETTI
BRIAN E BRETTI49 LAKE STST CATHARINES, ON L2R 5W9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, disseminating advertising materials for others via electronic media, namely radio, television, cable and Internet media, print media, and direct mailing; providing promotional services, namely promoting the goods and services of other through the distribution of electronic and printed material | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bretti, Brian E.
- Other trademarks owned by Bretti, Brian E.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named NIAGARA FALLS NEW YORK THE MOST FAMOUS ADDRESS IN THE WORLD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |