Drawing for SILHOUETTE BOMBSHELL

USPTO serial 78208763

SILHOUETTE BOMBSHELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILHOUETTE BOMBSHELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Louie

KAREN LOUIE LEGAL DEPTHARLEQUIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED225 DUNCAN MILL RDDON MILLS, ON M3B 3K9

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded audio and video tapes, cassettes and disks featuring works of fiction; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books of fictionACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, a series of fiction booksACTIVE—
035on-line retail and mail order services featuring books, video recordings and audio recordingsACTIVE—
038providing online electronic bulletin boards and online chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning books, and topics relating to women and women's issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Oct 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 23, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance