USPTO serial 78208821
PLANET EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANET EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine L. McDaniel, Esq.
KATHERINE L MCDANIEL ESQ KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 2600LOS ANGELES CA, 90067U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING MUSIC, STORIES, ANIMATED AND LIVE-ACTION PERFORMANCES, SCIENCE FICTION, COMEDY, DRAMA AND OTHER ENTERTAINMENT THEMES; PRE-RECORDED VIDEO AND AUDIO CASSETTES, VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES, VIDEO AND AUDIO DISCS, CD ROMS, COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, MUSICAL VIDEO RECORDINGS, MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS AND PHONOGRAPH RECORDS FEATURING MUSIC, STORIES, ANIMATED AND LIVE-ACTION PERFORMANCES, SCIENCE FICTION, COMEDY, DRAMA AND OTHER ENTERTAINMENT THEMES; COMPUTER SCREEN SAVER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; DECORATIVE REFRIGERATOR MAGNETS; ELECTRIC SWITCH PLATES; EYEGLASSES, EYEGLASS CASES, SUNGLASSES AND SUNGLASS CASES; COMPUTER AND VIDEO-GAME CASSETTES, CARTRIDGES, DISCS AND PROGRAMS; SWIM GOGGLES, SWIM MASKS AND SNORKELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |