USPTO serial 78209058
SCORPION XP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCORPION XP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas H. Pauley
DOUGLAS H PAULEY PAULEY PETERSEN KINNE & ERICKSON2800 W HIGGINS RD STE 365HOFFMAN ESTATES IL, 60195U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Archery products, namely arrow heads and arrow broadheads. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |