USPTO serial 78209186
IBIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IBIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Highlands Ranch, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business management, innovation and solutions services, research and information regarding business strategy, marketing, business development, organization development and management, mergers and acquisition, in the field of broadband communication business and content distribution business; Business development services, namely, providing start-up and on-going support involving integration and transactions for businesses of others, developing new business for others, facilitating business partnership and business integration; Business communications and networking, namely, proving consultation services in the nature of business and operation strategy and solutions, facilities management of technical operation, business acquisition and merger consultation, business brokerage, business investigation, business process re-engineering services in the nature of business management and supervision; Franchising, namely, offering business and technical assistance in the establishment and operation of broadband communication business, content distribution business, on-line transaction business; Business organizational consultation, business evaluation and planning, planning business strategy, providing business marketing information and consultation, business management in the nature of the operation, platform, and cost analysis for others; Providing business information regarding broadband communication business, marketing, business integration, partnership, mergers and acquisition, and information management, consultation in the nature of business and operation modeling, developing marketing and positioning strategy and processes for others; Promoting the business and technology services of others by creating partnership and establishing market entrance; Business, market, business technology and economic research and forecasting; Providing business management services, namely establishing business relationship and partnership, gathering and synergizing expertise and efforts, outsourcing, providing on-line business information and marketing data of transaction management and facilitation, telephone and on-line business directory information; On-line trading services in which seller posts products to be auctioned and bidding is done via the Internet and providing links to other like website; On-line retail store services featuring electronic devices, electronic game, electronic data, content (video, audio, etc), short messages, software, software codes, professional service, education services; On-line information exchange featuring technology information, business information, marketing information, electronic data, directory, e-commerce; Providing consultation services to others regarding research and development of new technology in the field of telecommunication, broadband communication, content distribution, multimedia technology and applications, e-commerce and transactions, electronic and optical technologies, electronic and optical systems and components, customer premises equipment, emerging technologies, operation technology and systems, and related system licensing of intellectual property | ACTIVE | Dec 16, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |