USPTO serial 78209264
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH D. SUZAN
Kenneth D. Suzan Hodgson Russ LLP140 Pearl Street, Suite 100The Guaranty BuildingBuffalo, NY 14202-4040| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | DVDs containing video files | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, brochures, pamphlets and stationery about hockey; newspapers featuring hockey; hockey memorabilia, namely, posters and prints, and trading cards; magazines about hockey, books and booklets about hockey, post cards, note cards, memo pads, ball point pens, pencils, 3-ring binders, folders, wire bound notebooks, portfolio notebooks, calendars, book covers, wrapping paper, children's activity books, statistical books, guide books and reference books for hockey, stationery-type portfolios, printed schedules; magazine columns;greeting cards, posters, printed paper signs, sticker packs and albums therefor, decals, trading cards and albums therefor, wall calendars, printed replica contract and press release forms,lithographs, serigraphs, paper bumper stickers; hockey stick pen sets; rule books and booklets relating to hockey; paper weights; desk-top business card holders; pen and pencil sets; paper goods and printed matter, namely, brochures, pamphlets and stationery about hockey | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | T-shirts, sweat shirts, hats, socks, toques, warm-up suits, shorts, and athletic uniforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toy action figures, hockey helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Pennants | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the sport of hockey through the organization of a hockey league, the promulgation of game rules, and the maintenance of high standards of sportsmanship; providing of entertainment and amusement through the medium of hockey games, maintenance and promotion of interests in hockey by means of publicity through the media of press, radio, films, television, parades, variety entertainment and similar projects, the organization and administration of ice hockey competitions; development of sportsmanship and athletic ability in youth through planned sporting events, namely, hockey events and hockey instruction; computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines and newsletters in the field of hockey; providing databases featuring general and local news and information of interest to hockey fans; association services; namely, promoting the interests of hockey clubs, hockey players, hockey coaches, hockey team owners, hockey fans, and the game of hockey; association services, namely, developing and implementing social and charitable programs on behalf of, inspired or promoted by, or through the participation of, hockey players and other athletes; organizing ice hockey tournaments and clinics, to promote cultural diversity in the field of hockey; dissemination of informational and educational material in the area of junior hockey, university hockey, college hockey, and high school hockey | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |