USPTO serial 78209294
INDIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Blue Rock Technologies Pty Limited
Scone, New South Wales, AU
Other trademarks owned by Blue Rock Technologies Pty Limited
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cologne and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | mens's, women's and children's clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, jeans, trousers, suits, shorts, dresses, skirts, body suits, pantyhose, tights, leotards, socks, cardigans, belts, cummerbunds, scarves, neck ties, cravats, gloves, sweaters, jumpers, loungewear, sweatbands, hats, bonnets, caps, visors, berets, earmuffs, t-shirts, sashes, shoes, boots, galoshes, sport and athletic footwear and clothing, namely, singlets, sweat-shirts, jackets, tops, shorts, track-suits, cross training shoes, running shoes, sandals, and flip flops; underclothing for women, namely, slips, bras, thongs, bloomers, suspenders, knickers, panties and teddies; underclothing for men, namely briefs, boxer shorts and singlets; underclothing for men, namely, briefs, boxer shorts and singlets; underclothing for infants and youthgs, namely, briefs, knickers, singlets and boxer shorts; bathing suits, swimwear and briefs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |