Drawing for HE'S CLEARLY DISCOVERED SMIRNOFF

USPTO serial 78209454

HE'S CLEARLY DISCOVERED SMIRNOFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HE'S CLEARLY DISCOVERED SMIRNOFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana M. Gilland

DANA GILLAND DIAGEO N AMERICA INC801 MAIN AVENORWALK, CT 06851UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely wines, spirits and liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance