USPTO serial 78209600
TEQUILA JOSE CUERVO CLASICO PLATA TEQUILA JOVEN HECHO EN MEXICO 40% ALC. BY VOL., NET. CONT. 1.75 LITERS, FUNDANDA EN 1795, FABRICA LA ROJENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEQUILA JOSE CUERVO CLASICO PLATA TEQUILA JOVEN HECHO EN MEXICO 40% ALC. BY VOL., NET. CONT. 1.75 LITERS, FUNDANDA EN 1795, FABRICA LA ROJENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEER AND NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT BEVERAGES; SOFT DRINKS, AND SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS; BEVERAGES INTENDED TO BE MIXED WITH BEER AND MALT BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT JUICES AND VEGETABLE JUICES; NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TEQUILA JOSE CUERVO CLASICO PLATA TEQUILA JOVEN HECHO EN MEXICO 40% ALC. BY VOL., NET. CONT. 1.75 LITERS, FUNDANDA EN 1795, FABRICA LA ROJENA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |