Drawing for TERRY TATE

USPTO serial 78209629

TERRY TATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TERRY TATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martha Gayle Barber

MARTHA GAYLE BARBER ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON ST STE 4000CHARLOTTE NC, 28280-4000U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FOOTWEAR, HEADWEAR, AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, SPORTSWEAR, SWEATPANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWEATERS, SLACKS, SOCKS, JACKETS, SWEATSSUITS, JUMPSUITS, WARM-UP SUITS, SHOOTING SHIRTS, FLEECE TOPS, TANK TOPS, POLO SHIRTS, PANTS, ATHLETIC BRAS, LEGGINGS, RAINSUITS, TURTLENECKS, BATHING SUITS, VESTS, PARKAS, DRESSES, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, GLOVES, WRIST BANDS, THERMAL UNDERWEAR, INFANTWEAR, COVERALLS, AND RUNNING SUITSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance