USPTO serial 78210594
LUMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
John A. Clifford Merchant & Gould, P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | APPARATUS FOR LIGHTING, NAMELY LAMPS, LIGHTS FOR VEHICLES; NEON AND FLUORESCENT LIGHTING TUBES AND CABLES FOR ILLUMINATION PURPOSES; SPOTLIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | LAND VEHICLES PARTS, NAMELY STEERING WHEEL AND AIRBAG COVERS, BRAKE AND CLUTCH PEDAL PADS AND COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | LUMINOUS STICKERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | TINTED, LAMINATED AND/OR REFLECTIVE PLASTIC ADHESIVE FILMS FOR USE IN HOME AND AUTOMOBILE WINDOWS AND AUTOMOBILE MIRRORS FOR USE PROTECTION, GLARE PROTECTION, UV RADIATION PROTECTION, HEAT INSULATION, SCRATCHING PROTECTION, DECORATION AND VISIBILITY PROTECTION, FOR PREVENTION OF SPLINTERING AND ANTI-FOR FILMS; FLEXIBLE PIPES NOT MADE OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Folia Tec Bohm GmbH & Co. Vertriebs KG
- Other trademarks owned by Folia Tec Bohm GmbH & Co. Vertriebs KG
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named LUMAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |