Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78211492?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78211492. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SEARCHAGENT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78211492, the listed owner(s) include: CONVERSIVE, INC., Virtual Personalities, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78211492?

Serial number 78211492 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SEARCHAGENT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SEARCHAGENT?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78211492

SEARCHAGENT

Q: What is the current status of SEARCHAGENT?

SEARCHAGENT (78211492) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 6, 2003
Status date: Nov 28, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office: LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEARCHAGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

CONVERSIVE, INC.
MALIBU, CA
Other trademarks owned by CONVERSIVE, INC.
Virtual Personalities, Inc.
Malibu, CA
Other trademarks owned by Virtual Personalities, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E. Baldauf, Jr.

KENT E BALDAUF JR WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH PA, 15219 1818U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	--Computer programs, namely an interactive natural language processing knowledge base used to build and customize interactive conversational mechanisms in the form of an animated or virtual character, which assist, answer questions and provide information to users of web sites, for use in real-time Internet relay communications platforms	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 20, 2006	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 19, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 28, 2006	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 28, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 13, 2006	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Sep 13, 2006	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jun 6, 2006	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jun 6, 2006	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Apr 7, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 24, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 24, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Nov 22, 2005	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Nov 22, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 18, 2005	REIN	REINSTATED	—
Sep 14, 2005	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Sep 14, 2005	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Aug 8, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Oct 25, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 25, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 14, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 26, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 1, 2003	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—