USPTO serial 78211571
ITG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel S. Koch
DANIEL S KOCH PALEY ROTHMAN4800 HAMPDEN LN 7TH FLBETHESDA MD, 20814 2922U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer networking equipment, namely, hubs, switches, routers, firewalls and other security appliances; and computer software, all serving the function of securing and protecting a company or other entity's information technology infrastructure, comprising its computer systems, networks, data, applications and information, from and against all forms of internal and external threats, attacks, breaches, violations and vulnerabilities, when operating as part of a network or when connected to the Internet. | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2002 |
| 042 | Information technology security consulting services, namely, integration of computer hardware, networks and software for others, to secure and protect a company or other entity's information technology ("IT") infrastructure, comprising its computer systems, networks, data, applications and information, from and against all forms of internal and external threats, attacks, breaches, violations and vulnerabilities, when operating as part of a network or when connected to the Internet; providing information via Internet website relating to such services in International Class 042. | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |