Drawing for GREEN MACHINE

USPTO serial 78211660

GREEN MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3357002Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Billie Jean Smith

Billie Jean Smith Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motorized power tools for lawn and garden use, namely, string trimmers, string trimmer and brush cutters, weeders, cultivators, air blowers for lawn debris, edgers, snow throwers, hedge trimmers, pruners, chain saws, brooms, sprayers, pressure washers, thatchers, aeators, and spreaders; Power driven and motor equipped power heads and attachment tools for all of the foregoing; Lawn Mowers; and Chipper ShreddersSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDDec 31, 1978

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Aug 9, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 17, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 29, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 22, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance