Drawing for HYPERGRIP

USPTO serial 78212052

HYPERGRIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPERGRIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randall J. Knuth

RANDALL J KNUTH RANDALL J KNUTH PC4921 DESOTO DRFORT WAYNE, IN 46815UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, FLUIDIC ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, FLUIDIC ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, FIBER OPTIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, THERMOCOUPLE ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, THERMOCOUPLE ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, DISPOSABLE ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, DISPOSABLE ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, WATERTIGHT ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, WATERTIGHT ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, HYBRID ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, HYBRID ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, MULTIPIN AND MIXED ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, MULTIPIN AND MIXED ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, PLASTIC ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, PLASTIC ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, ELECTRICAL PLUGS/ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND PARTS THEREOF.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 18, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 13, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Apr 13, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 11, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance