USPTO serial 78212052
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall J. Knuth
RANDALL J KNUTH RANDALL J KNUTH PC4921 DESOTO DRFORT WAYNE, IN 46815UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, FLUIDIC ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, FLUIDIC ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, FIBER OPTIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, THERMOCOUPLE ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, THERMOCOUPLE ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, DISPOSABLE ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, DISPOSABLE ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, WATERTIGHT ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, WATERTIGHT ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, HYBRID ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, HYBRID ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, MULTIPIN AND MIXED ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, MULTIPIN AND MIXED ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, PLASTIC ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, PLASTIC ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND PARTS THEREOF, ELECTRICAL PLUGS/ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND PARTS THEREOF. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |