USPTO serial 78212822
CHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Cronvich
JAMES T CRONVICH LAITRAM LLC LEGAL DEPT220 LAITRAM LNHARAHAN, LA 70123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Industrial microwave heaters and industrial microwave dryers for processing goods in the following industries-- coatings and adhesives industry, plastics industry, foam industry, laminates industry, ink industry, bulk and emulsion polymerization industry for processing synthetic fibers and pharmaceuticals, chemical catalyzation industry for processing synthetic fibers and pharmaceuticals, food and beverage industries for processing dairy goods, drinking water, juices, fruit and vegetable purees, cheese sauces, puddings, gelatins, meat and seafood emulsions, pasta sauces, salsa and tomato-based products, soy-based food products, and whey-based food products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |