Drawing for CATELLI

USPTO serial 78212909

CATELLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CATELLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEAN A. BIERKAN

TIMOTHY P FRAELICH JONES DAY901 LAKESIDE AVENUECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pasta saucesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 11, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 4, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 4, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 4, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance