USPTO serial 78213022
TRANQUILITY MAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANQUILITY MAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Hsia
Martin Hsia Cades Schutte a limited liability law partnership1000 Bishop Street12th FloorHonolulu, HI 96813Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Yoga exercise equipment, namely, yoga mats, yoga straps for stretching, yoga bags fitted for carrying yoga mats, yoga bricks, yoga blocks, yoga bolsters, zafus cushions for practicing yoga, yoga wedges, yoga balls and physio balls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trustees of the Wai Lan Yoga Trust, comprising Wai Lan Butler and Sunil Khemaney, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks owned by Trustees of the Wai Lan Yoga Trust, comprising Wai Lan Butler and Sunil Khemaney, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TRANQUILITY MAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |