USPTO serial 78213626
QUIKSILVEREDITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3136441Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2006
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIKSILVEREDITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, coats, jackets, sweaters, pullovers, pants, sweatpants, shorts, beachwear, swimwear, boardshorts, hats, caps, visors | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |