USPTO serial 78214343
JUMEX EL MARIACHI FIESTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUMEX EL MARIACHI FIESTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
55340 Xalostoc, MX
55340 Xalostoc, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK NY, 10017U.S. ARMYGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frugosa, S.A. de C. V.
- Other trademarks owned by Frugosa, S.A. de C. V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named JUMEX EL MARIACHI FIESTA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |