Drawing for CEQUENT TRAILER PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 78214437

CEQUENT TRAILER PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEQUENT TRAILER PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Dimitrijevs

JAMES A DIMITRIJEVS MCDONALD HOPKINS CO LPA600 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 2100BANK ONE CTRCLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Finish coating for vehicle accessoriesACTIVE—
006Metal ramps for use with vehicles, metal ladders, and metal clampsACTIVE—
007Winches.ACTIVE—
009Electrical wiring harnesses for vehicles trailersACTIVE—
011Lights for vehiclesACTIVE—
012Vehicle trailer couplers and hitches, trailer hubcaps and fenders, hitch balls, hitch blocks, boat trailer guides, boat motor locks, jack casters for trailers, jack couplers for trailers, anti-theft locks for use on vehicle tire wheels, spare tire carriers, boat trailer guides, boat motor locks, and vehicle mounted alignment guides for use in aligning a trailer tongue and a hitch ball during trailer attachmentACTIVE—
019Marine accessories, namely, dock bumpersACTIVE—
020Furniture, namely, adjustable workstations and adjustable worktablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 9, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance