Drawing for VXWIN

USPTO serial 78214479

VXWIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VXWIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH NY, 10510 0827U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the automation technology, namely, industrial robots for manufacturing, handling, manipulating and assembly purposes, parts of the aforementioned goods; industrial controls composed of the aforementioned goods as parts of machines and robots for use in the manufacturing industry; operating panels for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE
009Data processors and computers, computer programs for collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; computer software that assists computers in parallely deploying more than one operating system, in deploying parallel applications and performing parallel computations; computer software for use in connection with control tasks subject to the whole real-time-qualities; blank data carriers; electronic controllers as parts of machines and robots for use in the manufacturing industryACTIVE
042Design and development of computer hardware and data processing software for others, computer programming, for others for linking robot software to applications and manufacturing software; updating, leasing, maintenance of computer software; computer consultancy services for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
May 14, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance