USPTO serial 78215002
LUCEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUCEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Mallinckrodt
ROBERT R MALLINCKRODT THORPE N & WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Signal lights and signals, namely, exit and emergency exit lights, directional lights, directional arrow lights, path lights, emergency path lights, traffic lights, and lights which help people find their way and which guide people on their way; emergency warning lights; vehicular traffic lights, signals, and controls therefor; neon lights, neon tubes, and signs and displays comprising or including neon lights and neon tubes; and illuminated advertising signs | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric lighting installations, namely, a plurality of electric lamps and electric lighting fixtures for illuminating sales surfaces, presentation and exhibit areas, display windows, public and private buildings, financial and insurance institutions, libraries, administration buildings, penal institutions, galleries, museums, theaters, offices and workplaces, service areas, petrol stations, cinemas, public houses and discotheques, amusement and entertainment parks, exhibition centers and storage buildings, transport buildings, platforms, subways, tunnels, public streets and squares, car parks, airports, gangways, grandstands, stages, sports halls and stadiums, auditoriums, advertising signs, and road signs; electric lighting installations, namely, lighting for public and private events, concerts, parties, and performances; electric lighting fixtures for illuminating sales surfaces, presentation and exhibit areas, display windows, public and private buildings, financial and insurance institutions, libraries, administration buildings, penal institutions, galleries, museums, theaters, offices and workplaces, service areas, petrol stations, cinemas, public houses and discotheques, amusement and entertainment parks, exhibition centers and storage buildings, transport buildings, platforms, subways, tunnels, public streets and squares, car parks, airports, gangways, grandstands, stages, sports halls and stadiums, auditoriums, advertising signs, and road signs; electric lights and parts therefore, namely, light bulb filaments, fluorescent lamps and tubes, interior lamps, exterior lights, floodlighting lamps, hand-held lamps, built-in lamps, ceiling lamps, wall lamps, work station lights, living room lights, hanging lights, damp-proof lights, explosion-proof lamps, underwater lamps, lamps for tunnels, footpath lighting, and street lamps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Semperlux Aktiengesellschaft Lichttechnische Werke
- Other trademarks owned by Semperlux Aktiengesellschaft Lichttechnische Werke
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named LUCEA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |