USPTO serial 78215083
SPR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Leonardi
ROBERT M LEONARDI DANA TECHNOLOGY INC8000 YANKEE RDOTTAWA LAKE, MI 49267UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Driveshafts and driveshaft assemblies for land vehicles,associated hardware for use on land vehicles and parts thereof, namely shafts, yokes, universal joints, bearings, end fittings, journal crosses, and driveshaft center bearings. | ACTIVE | Jun 6, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |