USPTO serial 78215183
G & B SINCE 1818 QUALITY FENCING AND BORDERS 16 GAUGE 3" X 2" MESH ECONOMY FENCE 36" X 50' 91CM X 15.2M CLOTURE ECONOMIQUE CERCA ECONOMICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G & B SINCE 1818 QUALITY FENCING AND BORDERS 16 GAUGE 3" X 2" MESH ECONOMY FENCE 36" X 50' 91CM X 15.2M CLOTURE ECONOMIQUE CERCA ECONOMICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence J. Crain
LAWRENCE J CRAIN300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606-6771UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | woven, twisted and welded wire products, namely hardware cloth, netting, welded and woven fencing, wire netting, wire screening, wire trellis, welded fabric, wire folding fence, wire flower border fence and wire vegetable supports | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Midwest Air Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named G & B SINCE 1818 QUALITY FENCING AND BORDERS 16 GAUGE 3" X 2" MESH ECONOMY FENCE 36" X 50' 91CM X 15.2M CLOTURE ECONOMIQUE CERCA ECONOMICA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |