USPTO serial 78215260
REAL KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3391755Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REAL KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DALLAS, TX
St. Louis, MO
HAYWARD, CA
HAYWARD, CA
HAYWARD, CA
BOSTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
Jeffrey M. Furr Furr Law Firm2622 Debolt RoadUtica, OH 43080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, knives, forks and spoons; knives, forks and spoons made of precious metals; egg slicers; cheese slicers; pie slicers; cleavers; butchers' knives; non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers; knife sheaths; nutcrackers not of precious metal; non-electric openers; pizza cutters; sharpening stones; tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; hand operated vegetable shredders; sharpening blades; kitchen knives; carving sets comprised of knives and forks; steak knives' hand tools, namely, tongs and whetstones; flatware, namely, forks, knives and spoons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Cutting boards; stockpots; mashed potato kits, namely, non-electric food mill, peeler, casserole dishes with lids; wood trivets; turkey roasting kits, namely, pan, rack, basting bulb with cleaning brush, thermometer, spoon, string, recipe; serving platters; mixing bowls; mixing spoons; cookie sheets; spatulas; loaf pans; cake pans; springform pans; muffin tins; rolling pins; ladles; stainless steel soup ladles; pots; pans; mugs; plates; cups; saucers; bread dishes; brunch plates; sugar bowls; creamers; pancake kits, namely, non-electric griddle, ladle, flipper, rings; skillets; omelet pans; crepe pans; barbeque tool sets consisting of spatulas, tongs, turners; basting brushes; cooking skewers; grill trays; spice kits, namely, grinder, canisters, recipes; sauce pans; sauté pans; dinnerware, namely, place settings in porcelain, stoneware and/or glass; soup bowls; pressed and molded glass items, namely, bowls and figurines; copper pans; copper pots; steel pans; steel pots; bowls with snap-on lids; serving trays not of precious metal; wine openers; appetizer dishes and bowls; spice jars; serving utensils, namely, forks, ladles, spoons and tongs; non-electric pan roasters; cheese boards in wood or marble | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDED LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Real Kitchen Brands, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MERVYN'S LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MERVYN'S LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MERVYN'S LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL BRAND GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named REAL KITCHEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |