Drawing for SPLASHGUARD

USPTO serial 78215266

SPLASHGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPLASHGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karla C. Shippey

KARLA C SHIPPEY LAW OFFICES OF KARLA SHIPPEY4848 LAKEVIEW AVE STE BYORBA LINDA, CA 92886-3452UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020molded plastic insert for use in wide-mouth drinking bottles to reduce hole sizeACTIVENov 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 15, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance