USPTO serial 78215274
SLIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3144129Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
MIRIAM D. TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAYSUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONES, MOBILE AND CELLULAR TELEPHONES AND HANDSETS; ACCESSORIES FOR USE WITH TELEPHONES, MOBILE AND CELLULAR TELEPHONES AND HANDSETS, NAMELY, BATTERIES, POWER ADAPTERS, CAR POWER ADAPTORS AND HEADSET KITS COMPRISING OF HANDS FREE EARPIECE WITH MICROPHONE; ALL OF THE FOREGOING NOT IN CONNECTION WITH A MASCOT RELATING TO OR PROMOTING A BASEBALL TEAM | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |