USPTO serial 78215275
ENERGIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERGIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
CATHERINE J HOLLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FOURTEENTH FLIRVINE CA, 92614U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FOODSTUFFS FOR ANIMALS AND PET FOODS | ACTIVE | Apr 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |