USPTO serial 78215408
EARTH GROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3005204Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2005
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARTH GROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Godfread
Paul Godfread Godfread Law Firm, P.C.100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1900Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |