USPTO serial 78215596
LEADING-EDGE LAW GROUP, PLC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEADING-EDGE LAW GROUP, PLC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John B. Farmer
JOHN B FARMER LEADING EDGE LAW GROUP PLC1051 E CARY ST STE 1130RICHMOND, VA 23219-4029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of intellectual property; Development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of e-commerce; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of intellectual property; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of e-commerce; Intellectual property consultation; E-commerce consultation; Maintenance of patents for others; Patent licensing; Preparation of patent applications; Providing continuing legal education courses; Providing information in the field of intellectual property; Providing information in the field of e-commerce; Workshops and seminars in the field of intellectual property; Workshops and seminars in the field of e-commerce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |