USPTO serial 78215674
POTATOFINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2975606Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POTATOFINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Decatur, GA
Decatur, GA
POTATOFINGER SNACK FOODS, INC.
DECATUR, GA
Decatur, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle M. Globerman
Kyle M. Globerman Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP1320 Main StreetColumbia, SC 29201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Snack foods, namely, potato chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Potatofinger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Potatofinger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by POTATOFINGER SNACK FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Potatofinger, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named POTATOFINGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |