USPTO serial 78215736
ONO ONO HAWAIIAN BARBECUE & VEGGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3087146Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2006
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONO ONO HAWAIIAN BARBECUE & VEGGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Nebb
Kenneth G. Parker Teuton Loewy & Parker3121 Michelson DrSte 250Irvine, CA 92612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring Hawaiian and Korean food | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |