USPTO serial 78215971
ANDROFACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANDROFACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah S. Shepherd
DEBORAH S SHEPHERD KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE AND HEALTH SERVICES BY USERS; ELECTRONIC DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF EVALUATIONS OF THE QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE AND HEALTH SERVICES BY USERS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MASIMO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MASIMO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Andromed Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ANDROFACT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |