USPTO serial 78216093
RADO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RADO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Everett E. Fruehling
EVERETT E FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radios; compact disc players; audio cassette players; audio speakers; telephones; telephone answering machines; facsimile machines; television sets; lead-free solders in the electronics industry; electrical cables and wires; electric plugs and sockets; electric coils, converters and cords; electrical connectors; remote controls for stereos and televisions; blank audio tapes, computer disks, diskettes, optical disks and video tapes; calculators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |