Drawing for GRACO

USPTO serial 78216342

GRACO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRACO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Winger; Chritopher B. Schneider

LISA WINGER CHRITOPHER B SCHNEIDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RD STE 100OAK BROOK, IL 60523UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bath towels, hooded bath towels, wash cloths, wash mitts; bedding, namely, bed sheets and linens, pillowcases, blankets, throws, comforters, bedspreads, duvets, duvet covers, bed pads, mattress pads and covers, cushions, cushion covers, crib bumpers, crib canopies, window curtains, damasks, dust ruffles, quilts, pillow shams, decorative textile wall coverings and hangings, cloth bannersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 6, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 4, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 5, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 6, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 20, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance