Drawing for IT'S WHAT'S INSIDE THAT COUNTS

USPTO serial 78216470

IT'S WHAT'S INSIDE THAT COUNTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S WHAT'S INSIDE THAT COUNTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Selene Costello

KIERSTEN M SKOG MTV NETWORKS1515 BROADWAY FL 34VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION, AUDIO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION, VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES, VIDEO GAMES RECORDED ON CD-ROM FOR USE IN FREESTANDING VIDEO GAME MACHINES; AND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, GAME CARTRIDGES FOR COMPUTER VIDEO GAMES AND VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS SOLD AS A UNIT, COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES, COMPUTER GAME TAPES AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT; THEATRICAL AND MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; THEATRICAL AND MUSICAL VIDEO RECORDINGS, LASER DISCS AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, NAMELY, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS AND DVD; SUNGLASSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 12, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 19, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 20, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 20, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 25, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 25, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance