USPTO serial 78216697
ELEGANT HOME DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING SHOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2005
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELEGANT HOME DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING SHOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Boyce Jr
JOHN BOYCE JR FOSTER WALSH LLP9201 SPECTRUM CTR DR STE 210SAN DIEGO, CA 92123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging, promoting, and conducting consumer trade show exhibitions in the field of home furnishings, home design accessories and fixtures, and garden design products and services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |