Drawing for INTEGRA DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS

USPTO serial 78216710

INTEGRA DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRA DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Services to develop affordable housing propertiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 22, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 22, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance