USPTO serial 78216758
BOVIBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOVIBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christian D. Abel
Christian D. Abel Onsagers ASPb 6963 St. Olavs PlassOslo, 0130NORWAYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Proteins in the use of biomarkers, namely, protein arrays and nucleotide arrays for scientific and medical research | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Veterinary preparations, namely, pain relief medication; products for the animal livestock breeding market, namely animal semen; semen for artificial insemination of animal livestock; genetic radio-isotope markers for diagnostic use in animal livestock breeding; ovulation test kits for use in animal livestock breeding; preparations for detecting mutation in prion genes for veterinary purposes; veterinary diagnostic test strips and traceability tests; pharmaceutical preparations for the veterinary market for use in the prevention of osteoporosis; chemotherapeutics for the veterinary market; diagnostic preparations for medical and veterinary use; therapeutic products for the human pharmaceutical market, namely, pharmaceutical preparations, consisting of drug delivery system comprising polymer-based oral tablets for the continuous release of a wide variety of therapeutic agents; therapeutics for the animal livestock market, namely rubbing compound for therapeutic use on livestock; chemical preparations and reagents for veterinary research and veterinary breeding use; animal feed protein additive for use as a nutritional supplement | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Foodstuffs for animals; non-medicated additives for animal feed; feed components for animals, namely, animal feed additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as flavouring, ingredient or filler | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technology services for the veterinarian market, namely, computer hardware and software consultation for veterinarians, and computer programming in the medical field for veterinarians; technology service for progeny programs; namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management in the field of breeding, traceability testing and tracking animals; and testing pharmaceuticals, cosmetics or foodstuff; services to the human pharmaceuticals market, namely, pharmaceutical research and development of pharmaceuticals for humans | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, veterinary services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOVIBANK AS
- Other trademarks owned by Norwegian Biobank Cattle Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Norwegian Biobank Cattle Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BOVIBANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |