Drawing for VERIZON FREEDOM EXTRA

USPTO serial 78216765

VERIZON FREEDOM EXTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERIZON FREEDOM EXTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANIS M. MANNING

JANIS M MANNING VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC600 HIDDEN RDG DRC/O CHRISTIAN R ANDERSEN MC HQE03H14IRVING, TX 75038

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telephone telecommunication services; wireless telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice and data via electronic means; and providing multiple-user access to a global communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 25, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 8, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance