Drawing for THE FLY

USPTO serial 78216771

THE FLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin P. Hoffman

MARTIN P HOFFMAN HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER2461 S CLARK ST STE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012vehicles, namely, airplanes, helicopters, gliders, motorized blimps, zeppelins, vehicular air and gas balloons; and parachutesACTIVE—
028hang gliders; hang gliders powered by a motorized backpack; and paraglidersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2006DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 14, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance