CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EARTHFRESH FOODS

USPTO serial 78216772

EARTHFRESH FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3072710Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EARTHFRESH FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Cullis

John A. Cullis Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLPTwo North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed fresh vegetables, peeled vegetables, cut vegetables, blanched vegetables, parboiled vegetables, partially cooked vegetables, vegetables in sauce; processed potatoes, processed carrots, processed onions, processed beets, processed cabbage, processed cauliflower, processed celery, processed parsnips, processed rutabagas, processed tomatoes, and processed lettuce; mashed potatoes, sliced potatoes, peeled potatoes, parisienne potatoes, and processed lettuce; mashed potatoes, slice potatoes, peeled potatoes, parisienne potatoes, cut potatoes, peeled carrots, cut carrots, peeled onions; packaged salads, bagged cut lettuce, shredded cabbage; processed parsleySECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance